7 out of 9, with a MAE of 22.33.
| Home | Away | Venue | Predicted result | Actual result |
| Sydney | Hawthorn | SCG | Sydney, 14 | Hawthorn, 5 |
| Fremantle | Geelong | DS | Geelong, 14 | Geelong, 17 |
| Richmond | Essendon | MCG | Richmond, 48 | Richmond, 19 |
| N Melbourne | Port Adelaide | ES | N Melbourne, 5 | Port Adelaide, 28 |
| W Bulldogs | Gold Coast | CS | W Bulldogs, 37 | W Bulldogs, 48 |
| Adelaide | Collingwood | AO | Adelaide, 40 | Adelaide, 28 |
| Carlton | West Coast | MCG | West Coast, 46 | West Coast, 7 |
| St Kilda | Melbourne | ES | St Kilda, 4 | St Kilda, 36 |
| Brisbane | GWS Giants | GAB | GWS Giants, 46 | GWS Giants, 79 |
Not bad, not bad. There were a few too many results outside of the 30-point buffer for my liking, but it could’ve been worse.
| Position | Team | Overall rating (form) | Change in rating | Change in position |
| 1 | Adelaide | 23.27 (+10) | +0.09 | – |
| 2 | Sydney | 20.67 (+8) | -0.51 | – |
| 3 | West Coast | 19.81 (+8) | -0.79 | – |
| 4 | Hawthorn | 18.71 (+7) | -1.30 | – |
| 5 | GWS Giants | 16.87 (+10) | +3.48 | +1 |
| 6 | Geelong | 14.37 (+4) | +0.49 | -1 |
| 7 | W Bulldogs | 12.78 (+3) | +0.99 | – |
| 8 | Port Adelaide | 10.87 (+4) | +0.98 | – |
| 9 | N Melbourne | 6.25 (-3) | -1.85 | – |
| 10 | Richmond | -1.34 (-2) | +0.11 | – |
| 11 | Collingwood | -4.46 (+4) | +0.62 | +1 |
| 12 | Melbourne | -5.01 (-2) | -1.53 | -1 |
| 13 | St Kilda | -11.46 (-1) | +2.26 | +1 |
| 14 | Fremantle | -13.42 (-4) | -0.82 | -1 |
| 15 | Gold Coast | -21.77 (-8) | -0.59 | – |
| 16 | Carlton | -22.83 (-7) | +0.75 | – |
| 17 | Essendon | -35.48 (-14) | -0.04 | – |
| 18 | Brisbane | -39.63 (-17) | -2.03 | – |
Considering Hawthorn won and Sydney lost, it seems weird that Hawthorn had a much bigger drop-off than Sydney. However, most of Hawthorn’s rating is their attack and Sydney’s rating is defence, so because both teams scored under the average points, Hawthorn lost more points. Brisbane keep hitting new lows, GWS are hitting new highs. The new short-form leader is GWS.
Stattraction 